On 19.9.2013 16:33, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
The updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.03

I've moved some of the functionality to the testlibrary.

-JB -

On 12.9.2013 17:31, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 09/12/2013 05:13 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Jaroslav,

CustomLauncherTest.java:

102: this check could be moved to switch at ll. 108
otherwise test fails on "sunos" and "linux" because PLATFORM remains
unset.
Good idea. Thanks.

129: I would prefer don't have pattern like this one ever in shell
script. Could you prepare a list of VM's to check and just loop over it?
It makes test better readable. Also I think nowdays we can always use
server VM.
I tried to mirror the original shell test as closely as possible. It
would be nice if we could rely on the "server" vm only. Definitely more
readable.

-JB-

-Dmitry


On 2013-09-12 18:17, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:22 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 09/12/2013 10:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 09/12/2013 04:45 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Jaroslav,

You need a copyright notice in the new file.

As written this test can only run on a full JDK - so please add
it to
the :needs_jdk group in TEST.groups. (Does jcmd really needs to come
from the test-jdk? And use the VMOPTS passed to the test?)

Is there a reason this test can't run on OSX? I know it would need
further modification but was wondering if there is something
inherent in
the test that makes it inapplicable to OSX.

I think the test would be a lot simpler if the jdk tests had the
hotspot
test library's process tools available. :(
We have some, is there an obvious gap?

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/e407df8093dc/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/

Hm, thanks for the info. I should have used this library instead.

Please, stand by for the updated webrev.
I was able to get rid off the JCMD. Using the testlibrary the target
application can recognize its own PID and print it to its stdout. The
main application then just reads the stdout to parse the PID. No need
for JCMD any more.

I could not find a way to remove the dependency on "test.jdk" system
property. According to the jtreg web documentation
(http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/vmoptions.html#cmdLineOpts) a
"test.java"
system property should be available but in fact is not. But it seems
that the testlibrary uses "test.jdk" system property too.

The test does not run on OSX because nobody built the launcher
binary :)
I think it is a kind of DIY so I took the liberty of adding a
linux-amd64 launcher while working on the test.

While working with the test library I realized I was missing a crucial
feature (at least for my purposes) - waiting for a certain message to
appear in the stdout/stderr of the launched process. Very often I need
to wait for the target process to get to certain point before the test
can be allowed to continue - and the point is indicated by a message in
stdout/stderr. Currently all the proc tools are designed to work in
"batch" mode - the whole stdout/stderr is captured in strings and
analyzed after the target process died - and are not suitable for this
kind of usage.

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.01

-JB-


-Chris.

David
-----

On 12/09/2013 1:39 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the patch for an intermittently failing test.

The test is a shell test, using files for the interprocess
synchronization. This leads to intermittent failures.

In order to fix this the test is rewritten in Java - the original
functionality and outputs should be 100% preserved. The patch is
unfortunately a bit difficult to follow since there is no
similarity
between the *.sh and *.java file so one needs to go through the new
source in whole.

The changes in "launcher" files are all about adding permissions to
execute (0755) and as such the webrev shows no differences.

Thanks,

Issue  : JDK-8004926
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.00

-JB-




Reply via email to