Mikael, I just the final review for JDK-8031126 so I will be pushing that shortly to jdk9/hs-rt. Would you mind removing that entry from your change (unless you have already pushed it).
Thanks, /Staffan On 5 maj 2014, at 16:42, Mikael Auno <mikael.a...@oracle.com> wrote: > Thanks for spotting it. New webrev at > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.03/. > > Mikael > > On 2014-05-05 16:18, Staffan Larsen wrote: >> 8039432 is Resolved and should not be listed. >> >> /Staffan >> >> On 5 maj 2014, at 15:26, Mikael Auno <mikael.a...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> I've updated this change to use ProblemList.txt instead of @ignore >>> (since that was only intended for hotspot/test and not jdk/test). I've >>> also updated the data to nightly failures from the last two weeks with >>> issues since then filtered out manually. >>> >>> Hopefully this should address all concerns. >>> >>> New webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.02/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mikael >>> >>> On 2014-04-25 08:15, Staffan Larsen wrote: >>>> For test/com/sun/jdi/JdbReadTwiceTest.sh, you list JDK-8002116, but that >>>> bug is resolved so should not be reason to quarantine the test. >>>> >>>> For test/com/sun/jdi/RepStep.java you list JDK-6471769 JDK-6766320 but >>>> both of those are closed so should not be reason to quarantine the test. >>>> >>>> For test/demo/jvmti/mtrace/TraceJFrame.java you list JDK-8035195 and >>>> JDK-8039432, but 8035195 seems to be just an old name for 8039432 (looking >>>> it up in JBS takes you to 8039432). So 8035195 should not be listed. >>>> >>>> For test/sun/tools/jinfo/Basic.sh, there are no open bugs against it >>>> (except JDK-6542634 which is a timeout from 2007 and I’m not sure it is >>>> valid) so I don’t think it should be quarantined. >>>> >>>> /Staffan >>>> >>>> >>>> On 24 apr 2014, at 20:01, Mikael Auno <mikael.a...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've now added the keyword "quarantine" as well as fixed an issue with >>>>> placement of the @ignore tag (it's not allowed to come before @library). >>>>> >>>>> New webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.01/ >>>>> >>>>> Local testing: >>>>> >>>>>> % jtreg -jdk $JAVA_HOME -k:quarantine -ignore:quiet -verbose:summary >>>>>> /localhome/ws/jdk9-dev/jdk/test/ >>>>>> Test results: no tests selected >>>>>> Report written to /localhome/temp/run/JTreport/html/report.html >>>>>> Results written to /localhome/temp/run/JTwork >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mikael >>>>> >>>>> On 2014-04-22 17:12, Stefan Särne wrote: >>>>>> Hi Mikael, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should use a key word to group quarantined tests, which can >>>>>> be used to run the tests as a separate batch. Recommend to add this to >>>>>> all tests: >>>>>> @key quarantine >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that you may have to add the key word as a known key word to the >>>>>> TEST.ROOT file as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Stefan >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Mikael Auno >>>>>> Sent: den 16 april 2014 19:51 >>>>>> To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net >>>>>> Subject: RFR 8040748: [TESTBUG] Exclude failing (serviceability) jtreg >>>>>> tests using @ignore >>>>>> >>>>>> Please, review the following fix adding the @ignore tag to a couple of >>>>>> serviceability tests >>>>>> >>>>>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040748 >>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8040748/webrev.00/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Mikael >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
