On 15/12/2015 10:18 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:


while(true) would convey that much more clearly - and perhaps obviate
the need for pr_ex.


Yes, I can surely transform the code

-      while (pr_ex != curr_id) {
+      if (pr_ex != curr_id) {
+          while (true} {

The intention was to save a line :-)

I'll use while (true), if it improves readability.

It does :) And I don't you need pr_ex then as you can just compare OrderAccess::load_acquire(&process_exiting) with the current thread id - right?

Thanks,
David

Sincerely yours,
Ivan

Reply via email to