On 17/12/2015 6:23 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
On 17.12.2015 8:45, David Holmes wrote:
On 15/12/2015 10:18 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
while(true) would convey that much more clearly - and perhaps obviate
the need for pr_ex.
Yes, I can surely transform the code
- while (pr_ex != curr_id) {
+ if (pr_ex != curr_id) {
+ while (true} {
The intention was to save a line :-)
I'll use while (true), if it improves readability.
It does :) And I don't you need pr_ex then as you can just compare
OrderAccess::load_acquire(&process_exiting) with the current thread id
- right?
We will suspend the current thread if two conditions are satisfied:
process_exiting != 0 and process_exiting != current thread id.
But, yes, pr_ex isn't really needed, as we can use process_exiting
directly.
Here's the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8145127/01/webrev/
I still see pr_ex ??
David
Sincerely yours,
Ivan
