Hi Karen and David,
On 2/20/18 19:52, David Holmes wrote: Hi Karen, I support documenting this in the JVMTI spec and had a plan to fix it in 11. However, it is not clear to me yet if we have a consensus on it. This issue is tracked by: Yes, this is the one. Thank you, David, for posting the link. As I wrote there ... It is not at all clear how JDK-6404550 morphed into "Permit the adding or deleting of private final/static methods with redefine" - nor why those changes failed to make any change to the spec itself. It is also unclear whether the add/delete is restricted to final/static methods or any private method? I can see that the intent was to only allow something that would not perturb the vtable for existing instances. I agree, there is a confusion somewhere. Is it possible, the JDK-6404550 in JIRA is a different bug than the one in the Bugtraq system? The JDK-6404550 in JIRA has a different synopsis: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6404550 Cannot implement late attach in NetBeans Profiler due to missing functionality in JVMTI Thanks, Serguei -- |
- JVMTI retransformation and addition of private ... Karen Kinnear
- Re: JVMTI retransformation and addition of... David Holmes
- Re: JVMTI retransformation and additio... serguei.spit...@oracle.com
- Re: JVMTI retransformation and add... David Holmes
- Re: JVMTI retransformation and... serguei.spit...@oracle.com
- Re: JVMTI retransformatio... Daniel D. Daugherty
- Re: JVMTI retransform... Karen Kinnear
- Re: JVMTI retrans... Daniel D. Daugherty
- Re: JVMTI retrans... serguei.spit...@oracle.com
- Re: JVMTI retrans... serguei.spit...@oracle.com
- Re: JVMTI retrans... Karen Kinnear
- Re: JVMTI retrans... serguei.spit...@oracle.com
- Re: JVMTI retrans... David Holmes