Pushed.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 7/12/18 12:02, JC Beyler wrote:
Hi Serguei,

Here you are:

Thanks for the push!
Jc

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:33 AM serguei.spit...@oracle.com <serguei.spit...@oracle.com> wrote:
Thanks, Alex!

Jc,

I'll push it if you send me a patch.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 7/12/18 11:30, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Looks good to me as well.
>
> --alex
>
> On 07/12/2018 07:25, JC Beyler wrote:
>> Thanks Serguei!
>>
>> Anybody motivated to give this a review please?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jc
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:42 PM serguei.spit...@oracle.com
>> <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com> <serguei.spit...@oracle.com
>> <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Jc,
>>
>>     The fix looks good.
>>     I'll sponsor a push once it has been reviewed.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Serguei
>>
>>
>>     On 7/11/18 10:04, JC Beyler wrote:
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>     Could someone review the small-ish webrev for the bug:
>>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206960
>>>
>>>     The webrev is here:
>>>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8206960/webrev.00/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8206960/webrev.00/>
>>>
>>>     Basically, the tests were failing for two reasons:
>>>       - VMEventTest was failing because Graal does not support
>>>     DisableIntrinsic required by the test, I disabled testing the test
>>>     with Graal in this case
>>>       - The other tests were failing because the BCI <-> source code
>>>     line numbers are not always correct when using Graal via uncommon
>>>     traps; therefore the tests now check if Graal is being used and,
>>>     if so, only checks the method names. This allows us to still have
>>>     tests working with Graal, albeit a bit more coarse.
>>>
>>>     This passes all the HeapMonitor tests
>>>     with -vmoptions:"-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableJVMCI
>>>     -XX:+TieredCompilation -XX:+UseJVMCICompiler
>>> -Djvmci.Compiler=graal"
>>>
>>>     (Except the GCCMS one which is being fixed via the one-liner for
>>>     JDK-8205643).
>>>
>>>     Let me know what you think,
>>>     Jc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jc



--

Thanks,
Jc

Reply via email to