> On Nov 28, 2018, at 2:26 AM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 28/11/2018 4:30 pm, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>> P.s.
>> ConcurrentGCThread::ConcurrentGCThread() :
>> _should_terminate(false), _has_terminated(false) {
>> };
>> I was surprised to see no invocation to the base class ctor in the
>> initializer list. I was not aware that this was even possible. For
>> code clearness, I would prefer the call to the base class ctor to be
>> explicit.)
>
> I assume it is implicit. But yes it should be explicit.
It is implicit. In any constructor, if the initializer-list doesn’t contain a
call to a
(non-virtual) base class's constructor, an implicit call to the default
constructor
for that base class will be inserted at the appropriate place. (Virtual base
classes are more complicated, but since we avoid using them…)
It’s pretty common usage in our code to not explicitly mention default base
class
constructor calls.
