Adding serviceability-dev@... since the 'tmtools' including 'jstack'
are owned by the Serviceability team.

Dan


On 11/28/18 4:21 PM, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,

Could you review this fix for test serviceability/tmtools/jstack/WaitNotifyThreadTest.java?

On one hand the test was not properly checking what it was intended to check, since as mentioned in JBS the logic for checking the method name was wrong. Also since there was only one monitor in the test, the "for" loop with the message "waiting to re-lock in wait()" was never actually reached.

Additionally, with change 8150689 the message "waiting to re-lock in wait()" is now shown in the frame where the relocking is actually taking place, so the logic for checking that should change.

I fixed the first issues and added logic to check for the "waiting to re-lock in wait()" case. I used the Thread.State attribute to check desire states are reached before getting the thread dump reports through jstack. I run the test in mach5 several times for all platforms and they all passed.

Webrev URL: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchilanomate/8214148.01/webrev
Bug URL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214148 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150689>

Thanks,
Patricio

Reply via email to