On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:13:44 GMT, Ziviani
<[email protected]> wrote:
> TestInstanceKlassSize was failing because, for PowerPC, the following code
> (instanceKlass.cpp) always compiles to
> `return false;` bool InstanceKlass::has_stored_fingerprint() const {
> #if INCLUDE_AOT
> return should_store_fingerprint() || is_shared();
> #else
> return false;
> #endif
> }
> However, in `hasStoredFingerprint()@InstanceKlass.java` the condition
> `shouldStoreFingerprint() || isShared();` is
> always evaluated and may return true (_AFAIK isShared() returns true_). Such
> condition adds 8 bytes in the
> `getSize()@InstanceKlass.java` causing the failure in TestInstanceKlassSize:
> public long getSize() { // in number of
> bytes
> ...
> if (hasStoredFingerprint()) {
> size += 8; // uint64_t
> }
> return alignSize(size);
> }
> Considering these tests are failing for PowerPC only (_based on
> ProblemList.txt_), my solution checks if
> `hasStoredFingerprint()` is running on a PowerPC platform. I decided to go
> this way because there is no existing flag
> informing whether AOT is included or not and creating a new one just to
> handle the PowerPC case seems too much. This
> patch is an attempt to fix https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230664
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b1448da1
Author: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <[email protected]>
Committer: Martin Doerr <[email protected]>
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/b1448da1
Stats: 27 lines in 6 files changed: 24 ins; 2 del; 1 mod
8253900: SA: wrong size computation when JVM was built without AOT
Reviewed-by: cjplummer, sspitsyn
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/358
