On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:19:02 GMT, zzambers <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:

> Condition is obviously wrong, because if name starts with "java." other 2 
> conditions are always true. Intent, as I understand it, was to redefine class 
> where debug event took place (in case of test classes), unless it took place 
> in class of jdk itself, in which case redefine test's main class (if 
> redefineAtEvents is true of course). Check for class names starting with 
> "jdk." was added with later commit [1], not touching that wrong condition 
> (check for classes belonging to jdk) and putting check to else branch instead 
> (therefore not doing any redefinition in case name starts with "jdk.").
> 
> Actually fix is done to be then backported to jdk8u, where 
> com/sun/jdi/RedefineCrossEvent.java test stared failing after recent backport 
> [2], due to missing check for classes starting with "jdk." [3]:
> ...
> Redefining class jdk.internal.misc.TerminatingThreadLocal (no class loader)
> FAIL: redefine - unexpected exception: java.io.FileNotFoundException: 
> /home/tester/test.1638289866/jdk/JTwork/classes/com/sun/jdi/jdk/internal/misc/TerminatingThreadLocal.class
>  (No such file or directory)
> ...
> 
> This test actually passes for (latest) jdk. However fixing this condition 
> before doing backport, rather than backporting it in current form seems like 
> right thing to do. I tested this locally and jdi tests are passing with this 
> change for latest jdk (and also for jdk8u).
> 
> [1]  
> https://github.com/zzambers/jdk/commit/426873751c710061d0f9bc713a0de47373e51418#diff-778880449f85966d3c6b219b8ceb41fdbbe7acc5e520d2aa27aada3f33bf1eab
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273772
> [3] 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/blob/7d3c0bede34930cadd76644e58bf56f2a83c3d01/jdk/test/com/sun/jdi/TestScaffold.java#L535

@robilad Could you please OCA check this, please?

@zzambers I've filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8279669 for this. 
Please mention it in the PR title so that the bots can properly link the issue. 
See the jcheck message. Then it should be ready for review.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6652

Reply via email to