serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v2] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v2] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v2] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v2] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v3] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v3] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v3] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v4] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v4] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v5] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v6] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v7] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v8] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v8] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v9] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v10] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v11] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v11] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v11] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v11] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v12] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v12] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v12] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v12] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v12] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee [v13] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Integrated: 8283849: AsyncGetCallTrace may crash JVM on guarantee Jaroslav Bachorik
• RFR: JDK-8285921: serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachReturnError.java fails on Alpine Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285921: serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachReturnError.java fails on Alpine Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285921: serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachReturnError.java fails on Alpine David Holmes
  • Integrated: JDK-8285921: serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/AttachFailed/AttachReturnError.java fails on Alpine Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8284027: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8284027: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001/ is failing Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Withdrawn: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Alex Menkov
  • RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8279358: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI03/ji03t003/TestDescription.java fails with usage tracker Alex Menkov
• Integrated: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning. Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v2] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v2] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v2] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v3] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v4] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v4] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v5] Johannes Bechberger
  • Re: RFR: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment [v5] Jaroslav Bachorik
  • Integrated: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment Johannes Bechberger
• RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class Leonid Mesnik
• RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v4] Mandy Chung
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Mandy Chung
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Pavel Rappo
  • Integrated: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8285032: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8285032: vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/EventSet/suspendPolicy/suspendpolicy008/ fails with "eventSet.suspendPolicy() != policyExpected" Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Use more precise name for ReferenceType::REF_OTHER [v3] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v3] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v3] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v5] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference [v6] Albert Mingkun Yang
• Interest in Java based attach provider implementation? Philippe Marschall
• RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) XenoAmess
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) liach
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v2] XenoAmess
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v3] XenoAmess
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v3] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v3] XenoAmess
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v4] XenoAmess
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v4] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8285149: Using HashMap.newHashMap to replace new HashMap(int) [v4] XenoAmess

• Earlier messages
• Later messages