serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8392477: -XX:UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions and -XX:UnlockExperimentalVMOptions produce incorrect error Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392477: -XX:UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions and -XX:UnlockExperimentalVMOptions produce incorrect error David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8392477: -XX:UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions and -XX:UnlockExperimentalVMOptions produce incorrect error David Holmes
• RFR: 8392559: [GCC static analyzer] potential dereference of NULL pointer tagPtr in methodSignature_returnTag Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392559: [GCC static analyzer] potential dereference of NULL pointer tagPtr in methodSignature_returnTag Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392474: Remove default argument from strdup_check_oom mem_tag parameter Stefan Karlsson
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v25] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v25] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v25] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v25] Frederic Parain
• Integrated: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize Denghui Dong
• RFR: 8392429: Problem list vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/StackFrame/PopFrames/popframes001/TestDescription.java due to JDK-8391440 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8392429: Problem list vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/StackFrame/PopFrames/popframes001/TestDescription.java due to JDK-8391440 Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8392429: Problem list vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/StackFrame/PopFrames/popframes001/TestDescription.java due to JDK-8391440 Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8392429: Problem list vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/StackFrame/PopFrames/popframes001/TestDescription.java due to JDK-8391440 Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8392429: Problem list vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/StackFrame/PopFrames/popframes001/TestDescription.java due to JDK-8391440 Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Ivan Bereziuk
  • Integrated: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v24] Johan Sjölen
• RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Integrated: 8392345: Omit filler objects in 'live' heap dump Oli Gillespie
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v23] Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v22] Johan Sjölen
• RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" [v2] David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8392323: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspectWithValueObject.java fails due to "Multiple garbage collectors selected" Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8374364: TestCgroupMetrics.java fails when cpuset unmounted [v15] sendaoYan
• Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] Denghui Dong
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] Denghui Dong
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v4] David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v3] Denghui Dong
• RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8382486: Assert failed in frame::sender [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
• RFR: 8381336: SA FlatArray support is incomplete Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8247504: SA: InstanceKlass.getSize() needs an update because of value types Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v19] Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v21] Johan Sjölen
• RFR: 8389457: GC.class_histogram reports duplicate rows for refined array layouts Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v20] Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v18] Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8390306: The fields for layout support can be put into one class [v17] Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize Denghui Dong
• Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v2] Denghui Dong
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v2] Denghui Dong
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8392031: Crash in ThreadSnapshot::initialize [v2] Denghui Dong
• RFR: 8271610: HeapMonitorInitialAllocationTest fails intermittently Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8271610: HeapMonitorInitialAllocationTest fails intermittently Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8271610: HeapMonitorInitialAllocationTest fails intermittently Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8271610: HeapMonitorInitialAllocationTest fails intermittently Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8271610: HeapMonitorInitialAllocationTest fails intermittently Fairoz Matte
• RFR: 8391940: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: ERROR: DWARF: Unknown opcode: 0xf Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8391940: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: ERROR: DWARF: Unknown opcode: 0xf Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8391940: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: ERROR: DWARF: Unknown opcode: 0xf Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8391940: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: ERROR: DWARF: Unknown opcode: 0xf Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8391940: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: ERROR: DWARF: Unknown opcode: 0xf Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8391064: JMX: RMIConnector findRMIServer error message should not mention /ior/ by1361092
• RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent [v2] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Integrated: 8390949: Remove displaced-mark related code from SA agent Fredrik Bredberg
• RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flattened fields Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flat fields [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flat fields [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flat fields [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flat fields [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flat fields [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Integrated: 8391951: Rename inlined fields to flat fields Stefan Karlsson
• RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename Stefan Karlsson
  • Integrated: 8391950: Clean out leftovers from inline to value rename Stefan Karlsson
• RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v3] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v2] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v3] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v3] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v3] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize [v3] April Ivy
  • Integrated: 8311029: G1: Check constraints before adjusting G1HeapRegionSize Yunbo Zhang
• RFR: 8391063: Attach API (v2) should check for zero-sized request Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8391063: Attach API (v2) should check for zero-sized request April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8391063: Attach API (v2) should check for zero-sized request Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8391063: Attach API (v2) should check for zero-sized request Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8391063: Attach API (v2) should check for zero-sized request Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8327645: Serial heap dump should not consume double amount of disk space Sergey Nazarkin
  • Re: RFR: 8327645: Serial heap dump should not consume double amount of disk space Sergey Nazarkin
• RFR: 8391761: Emit FillerElement[] instead of int[] in heap dump Oli Gillespie
• RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java [v2] Fairoz Matte
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8391495: Apply JDK-8370201 to serviceability/sa/sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java Fairoz Matte
• RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v6] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v6] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v6] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v6] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8391728: Rename inline klass / type to value klass / type to match Java side of JEP 401 [v6] Dan Heidinga

• Earlier messages