serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Integrated: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v18] Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Integrated: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
• RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v3] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v4] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v5] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Jean-Philippe Bempel
• RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Paul Sandoz
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v16] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v15] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v5] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v6] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v5] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread Leonid Mesnik
  • Withdrawn: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v5] Ivan Bereziuk
• Withdrawn: 8336881: [Linux] Support for hierarchical limits for Metrics duke
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v14] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v14] Emanuel Peter
• Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v4] Thomas Stuefe
• RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Integrated: 8376052: Use AttachOperationFailedException rather than AttachNotSupportedException in findTargetProcessTmpDirectory() Yasumasa Suenaga
• Integrated: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v16] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v16] Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v15] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v15] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v15] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v15] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v15] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
• Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v5] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v5] Xiaolong Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
• Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v3] Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8373366: HandshakeState should disallow suspend ops for disabler threads [v14] Serguei Spitsyn
• [jdk26] RFR: Merge 4b0189c444a061f4e1e4dd27e7980ebb81252284 Brent Christian
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: Merge 4b0189c444a061f4e1e4dd27e7980ebb81252284 Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: Merge 4b0189c444a061f4e1e4dd27e7980ebb81252284 Phil Race
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: Merge 4b0189c444a061f4e1e4dd27e7980ebb81252284 Stuart Marks
  • [jdk26] Integrated: Merge 4b0189c444a061f4e1e4dd27e7980ebb81252284 Brent Christian
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: Merge 4b0189c444a061f4e1e4dd27e7980ebb81252284 [v2] Brent Christian
• RFR: Merge 07f981f6b0bb8a7e444fd744791f73853e9fa325 Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: Merge 07f981f6b0bb8a7e444fd744791f73853e9fa325 Kevin Rushforth
  • Re: RFR: Merge 07f981f6b0bb8a7e444fd744791f73853e9fa325 Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: Merge 07f981f6b0bb8a7e444fd744791f73853e9fa325 Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: Merge 07f981f6b0bb8a7e444fd744791f73853e9fa325 [v2] Brent Christian
  • Integrated: Merge 07f981f6b0bb8a7e444fd744791f73853e9fa325 Brent Christian
• Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count and maximum limit to VM.info [v8] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count and maximum limit to VM.info [v8] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count to VM.info [v8] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count to VM.info [v8] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count to VM.info [v8] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count to VM.info [v8] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count to VM.info [v8] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count and maximum limit to VM.info [v7] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count and maximum limit to VM.info [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count and maximum limit to VM.info [v7] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count and maximum limit to VM.info [v7] Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8357828: add timestamp to jcmd v2 Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v2] Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v13] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v3] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8375692: Hotspot container tests assert with non-ascii vendor name [v3] Severin Gehwolf

• Earlier messages
• Later messages