serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8309400: JDI spec needs to clarify when OpaqueFrameException and NativeMethodException are thrown [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309400: JDI spec needs to clarify when OpaqueFrameException and NativeMethodException are thrown [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309400: JDI spec needs to clarify when OpaqueFrameException and NativeMethodException are thrown [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8309400: JDI spec needs to clarify when OpaqueFrameException and NativeMethodException are thrown [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309400: JDI spec needs to clarify when OpaqueFrameException and NativeMethodException are thrown [v3] Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state Leonid Mesnik
• [jdk25] RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Chris Plummer
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Chris Plummer
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Chris Plummer
• [jdk25] RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Richard Reingruber
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Chris Plummer
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Richard Reingruber
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Richard Reingruber
• RFR: 8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError Richard Reingruber
  • Integrated: 8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError Richard Reingruber
• [jdk25] RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native SendaoYan
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native SendaoYan
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native SendaoYan
• RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8361905: Problem list serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThreadContext.java on Windows due to JDK-8356704 Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8361869: Tests which call ThreadController should mark as /native SendaoYan
• RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v3] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v3] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v4] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception [v4] Richard Reingruber
  • Integrated: 8361602: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java deadlocks on exception Richard Reingruber
• RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v6] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8361314: Test serviceability/jvmti/VMEvent/MyPackage/VMEventRecursionTest.java FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8361680: Use correct enum Claim value in VM_HeapWalkOperation::collect_simple_roots Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8361680: Use correct enum Claim value in VM_HeapWalkOperation::collect_simple_roots Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8361680: Use correct enum Claim value in VM_HeapWalkOperation::collect_simple_roots Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Integrated: 8361680: Use correct enum Claim value in VM_HeapWalkOperation::collect_simple_roots Albert Mingkun Yang
• [jdk25] RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Richard Reingruber
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Martin Doerr
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Kevin Walls
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Richard Reingruber
• [jdk25] RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Chris Plummer
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Kevin Walls
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Chris Plummer
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires David Briemann
  • Re: RFR: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires [v2] David Briemann
  • Re: RFR: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires [v2] David Briemann
  • Integrated: 8361599: [PPC64] enable missing tests via jtreg requires David Briemann
• Integrated: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage Julian Waters
• RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Integrated: 8358679: [asan] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti tests show memory issues Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8361188: Test java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JComboBoxOverlapping.java fails on Mac OS X Khalid Boulanouare
• RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8351487: [ubsan] jvmti.h runtime error: load of value which is not a valid value Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v6] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v6] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8361325: Refactor ClassLoaderExt Calvin Cheung
• RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8361292: Rename ModuleEntry::module() to module_oop() Ioi Lam
• RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8305567: serviceability/tmtools/jstat/GcTest01.java failed utils.JstatGcResults.assertConsistency Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8360599: [TESTBUG] DumpThreadsWithEliminatedLock.java fails because of unstable inlining Alan Bateman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages