On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:22:03 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This can be a separate RFE if the reason for it being a nosafepoint lock no >> longer holds. It would be cleaner to use a normal safepoint checking lock >> than to artificially make the thread safepoint-safe before using it. > > Agreed. I was thinking about a separate RFE. I started seeing some failures > in the S/R related tests with the removed `ThreadBlockInVM` and > `_no_safepoint_check_flag`. Need to investigated why. Otherwise, it seems to > be working well. As I see there can be some problems with the JVMTI Suspend/Resume but it is worth to investigate anyway. So, I've filed an RFE: [JDK-8299240](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8299240): rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11690
