On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:37:05 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Use new javadoc capabilities courtesy JDK-8200337 to have
> more-readable-in-javadoc-source links to anchors in several management types.
> Analogous change is out for review in core libs, JDK-8300133.
src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/remote/JMXConnectorFactory.java
line 140:
> 138: * implementation may choose to find providers by other means. For
> 139: * example, it may support {@linkplain
> 140: * java.base/java.util.ServiceLoader##developing-service-providers
> service providers},
is `java.base/` needed here? I am a bit surprised - it's first time I see a
module name used in a regular link target.
src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/remote/JMXConnectorServerFactory.java
line 129:
> 127: * <code>MalformedURLException</code> if there is none. An
> 128: * implementation may choose to find providers by other means. For
> 129: * example, it may support {@linkplain
Same remark regarding `java.base/` prefix.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12058
