On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:21:06 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> review: tweak in count_transitions_and_correct_jvmti_thread_states
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/ToggleNotifyJvmtiTest/ToggleNotifyJvmtiTest.java
> line 45:
>
>> 43: // to have sleep() calls to provide yielding as some frequency of virtual
>> 44: // thread mount state transitions is needed for this test scenario.
>> 45: class TestedThread extends Thread {
>
> Shouldn't this be a Runnable instead of a Thread? I would also suggest not
> using the term "thread" here. Maybe "task"? Otherwise code like the
> following is misleading:
>
>
> TestedThread thread = threads[i];
> thread.letFinish();
>
> There are no threads being referenced in this code, yet the term "thread" is
> used 4 times.
Thank you for the suggestion. I've renamed/rearranged it now. Let me know if it
is not what you expected.
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/ToggleNotifyJvmtiTest/ToggleNotifyJvmtiTest.java
> line 172:
>
>> 170: setVirtualThreadsNotifyJvmtiMode(iter, false);
>> 171:
>> 172: Thread tt =
>> Thread.ofPlatform().name("StartThreadsTest").start(ToggleNotifyJvmtiTest::startThreads);
>
> Why does each test cycle need to be run in a separate platform thread? Can't
> you just use the main test thread?
You are right, hanks. I've made the suggested change.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13133#discussion_r1154022482
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13133#discussion_r1154023063
