On Fri, 5 May 2023 06:28:59 GMT, Yadong Wang <yadongw...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thanks for reporting. It would be interesting to see what address you get >> and compare it to the range [ZAddressHeapBase, >> ZAddressHeapBase+ZAddressOffsetMax). > > We emailed to erik to discuss this issue two months ago, and maybe he missed > it. > ZForwardingTest does not guarantee a successful invoke of os::commit_memory > for ZAddressHeapBase, and we saw some conflicts between ZAddressHeapBase and > the metadata address space on the RISC-V hardware of 39-bits virtual address. > There is no failure in the normal initialization phase of JVM, because the > commit order of them is guaranteed. Could you provide the values for `reserved`, `ZAddressHeapBase`, and `ZAddressOffsetMax, when this test is failing. I'd like to know if we can make a workaround for you, or if we have to turn off the test for riscv. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13771#discussion_r1185751935
