On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 02:17:56 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> I noticed that "clhsdb jstack" seemed to hang when I attached to process with 
> a somewhat large heap. It had taken over 10 minutes when I finally decided to 
> have a look at the SA process (using bin/jstack), which came up with the 
> following in the stack:
> 
> 
> at 
> sun.jvm.hotspot.oops.ObjectHeap.iterateObjectsOfKlass([jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal](jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal)/ObjectHeap.java:117)
> at 
> sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.ConcurrentLocksPrinter.fillLocks([jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal](jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal)/ConcurrentLocksPrinter.java:70)
> at 
> sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.ConcurrentLocksPrinter.<init>([jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal](jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal)/ConcurrentLocksPrinter.java:36)
> at 
> sun.jvm.hotspot.tools.StackTrace.run([jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal](jdk.hotspot.agent@23-internal)/StackTrace.java:71)
> 
> 
> This code is meant to print information about j.u.c. locks. It it works by 
> searching the entire java heap for instances of AbstractOwnableSynchronizer. 
> This is a very expensive operation because it means not only does SA need to 
> read in the entire java heap, but it needs to create a Klass mirror for every 
> heap object so it can determine its type.
> 
> Our testing doesn't seem to run into this slowness problem because "clhsdb 
> jstack" only iterates over the heap if AbstractOwnableSynchronizer has been 
> loaded, which it won't be if no j.u.c. locks have been created. This seems to 
> be the case wherever we use "clhsdb jstack" in testing. We do have some tests 
> that likely result in j.u.c locks, but they all use "jhsdb jstack", which 
> doesn't have this issue (it requires use of the --locks argument to enable 
> printing of j.u.c locks).
> 
> This issue was already called out in 
> [JDK-8262098](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8262098). For this CR I am 
> proposing that "clhsdb jstack" not include j.u.c lock scanning by default, 
> and add the -l argument to enable it. This will make it similar to 
> bin/jstack, which also has a -l argument, and to "clhsdb jstack", which has a 
> --locks argument (which maps internally to the Jstack.java -l argument).
> 
> The same changes are also being made to "clhsdb pstack".
> 
> Tested with all tier1, tier2, and tier5 svc tests.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 192349ee
Author:    Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/192349eee4b6d50f16d44969eb882875c67d651d
Stats:     228 lines in 10 files changed: 204 ins; 1 del; 23 mod

8324066: "clhsdb jstack" should not by default scan for j.u.c locks because it 
can be very slow

Reviewed-by: kevinw, amenkov

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17479

Reply via email to