On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:17:09 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The implementation of the JVM TI `GetCurrentContendedMonitor()` does not 
>> match the spec. It can sometimes return an incorrect information about the 
>> contended monitor. Such a behavior does not match the function spec. 
>> With this update the `GetCurrentContendedMonitor()` is returning the monitor 
>> only when the specified thread is waiting to enter or re-enter the monitor, 
>> and the monitor is not returned when the specified thread is waiting in the 
>> `java.lang.Object.wait` to be notified.
>> 
>> The implementations of the JDWP `ThreadReference.CurrentContendedMonitor` 
>> command and JDI `ThreadReference.currentContendedMonitor()` method are based 
>> and depend on this JVMTI function. The JDWP command and the JDI method were 
>> specified incorrectly and had incorrect behavior. The fix slightly corrects 
>> both the JDWP and JDI specs. The JDWP and JDI implementations have been also 
>> fixed because they use this JVM TI update. Please, see and review the 
>> related CSR and Release-Note.
>> 
>> CSR: [8326024](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8326024): JVM TI 
>> GetCurrentContendedMonitor is implemented incorrectly
>> RN:   [8326038](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8326038): Release Note: 
>> JVM TI GetCurrentContendedMonitor is implemented incorrectly
>> 
>> Testing:
>>  - tested with the mach5 tiers 1-6
>
> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge
>  - fix specs: JDWP ThreadReference.CurrentContendedMonitor command, JDI 
> ThreadReference.currentContendedMonitor method
>  - 8256314: JVM TI GetCurrentContendedMonitor is implemented incorrectly

PING!! Need a couple of reviews, please.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17944#issuecomment-1972989702

Reply via email to