On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:02:16 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Wouldn't this just be a case of changing a flag description? As luck has it, > the flag already has a generic name that is not tied to OOMs. Yes it is some work on documentation (but seems some doc work needs to be done anyway because it was forgotten when `HeapDumpGzipLevel` was introduced). And the current name is generic and does not mention the OOM case in the name itself, the current implementation would better match the name if it was `HeapDumpPathOnOom` or something like this. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18190#issuecomment-2025456286
