On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:32:30 GMT, Stefan Karlsson <stef...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> The GCs scan and handles nmethods and ignores CodeBlobs of other kinds. The I 
> propose that we stop sending in CodeBlobs to the GCs and make sure to only 
> give them nmethods.
> 
> I removed `void CodeCache::blobs_do(CodeBlobClosure* f)` since there's no 
> more usage of that function. Is this OK?
> 
> I also opted to skipped calling the GC verification code from the iterator 
> code:
> 
> Universe::heap()->verify_nmethod((nmethod*)cb);
> 
> IMHO, I think it is up to the GCs to decide if they want to perform extra 
> nmethod verification. If someone wants to keep this verification in their 
> favorite GC I can add calls to this function where we used to call 
> CodeCache::blobs_do.
> 
> I've only done limited testing and will run extensive testing concurrent with 
> the review.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 87131fb2
Author:    Stefan Karlsson <stef...@openjdk.org>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/87131fb2f77188a483fd0852da5f9228aafd5336
Stats:     850 lines in 74 files changed: 238 ins; 318 del; 294 mod

8329629: GC interfaces should work directly against nmethod instead of CodeBlob

Reviewed-by: ayang, eosterlund

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18653

Reply via email to