On Mon, 13 May 2024 15:48:43 GMT, Stefan Karlsson <stef...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I tend to agree with that. My earlier question still stands: is there a 
>> better place to put it? Right now the "enforced with code" in a stand-alone 
>> file doesn't tell me "why" this rule is important.
>
> If you want to keep the static_assert it in the .cpp file, then I won't block 
> that.

> Could you instead put the static_assert near the code that will break?

I like that. I will do that.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19172#discussion_r1599476559

Reply via email to