On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:49:51 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'm still not sure this works. It seems kind of muddled. Rather than trying >> to retrofit in the clarifying text, why not start from scratch. That should >> result in better organization and clearer descriptions. For example, I think >> first you should clarify what is meant by a "null pointer". Maybe even make >> that a separate section. I can take a stab at this later today if you want. > > How about undoing the changes in this subsection and then just add the > following as a preceding subsection: > > **Null Pointers** > > Parts of this specification refer to a "null pointer" as a possible function > parameter or return value. A "null pointer" is C `NULL` or C++ `nullptr`. Good suggestion, thanks! Will add it now. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19257#discussion_r1628565113
