On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:08:37 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> My concern is that the logic was wrong and so you fixed it, but this then 
> screams out for a test that would have detected the error, but you can't 
> write a test because the line can never be empty, so that becomes an 
> invariant rather than a runtime check.

Do I understand this right that the suggestion is to add an explicit runtime 
check for non-emptiness and report an error if an empty line has been 
discovered? If so, then the  `is_empty()`check can be removed from  the 
`CmdLine::is_executable()`.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20006#issuecomment-2224336709

Reply via email to