On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:56 GMT, Alex Menkov <amen...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I still think that it would be safer to explicitly specify that caller knows > that jthread can be virtual thread I think that retains the risk of the caller not knowing they need to ensure they protect the carrier thread. > Do you want to update ThreadSnapshotFactory::get_thread_snapshot to utilize > new functionality No, we had some internal discussions and that code is incorrectly using the JVMTI transition disabler, so it needs a complete overhaul. That will be handled separately. Thanks again for looking at this in depth Alex. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26287#issuecomment-3105187899
