On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:59:09 GMT, Shiv Shah <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Fixed three test files that fail with -Xcheck:jni on debug builds:
>> 
>> popframe007.cpp: CallStaticVoidMethod in native B() was called with the 
>> declaring class (popframe007) instead of TestThread where the method ID 
>> belongs. Stored TestThread class as a global ref in getReady() and used it 
>> in B()
>> 
>> aod.cpp: nsk_aod_agentLoaded() and nsk_aod_agentFinished() call 
>> CallStaticVoidMethod without checking for pending exceptions. Added 
>> nsk_aod_checkJNIException wrapper that describes, clears, and fails on 
>> unexpected exceptions. Fixes all 13 AttachOnDemand tests
>> 
>> retransform003.cpp: ClassFileLoadHook callback calls CallObjectMethod and 
>> CallStaticObjectMethod without checking for pending exceptions. Added 
>> ExceptionCheck/ExceptionClear after both calls
>> 
>> bi02t001 and bi03t001 pass without changes, NMT corruption issue from JDK 22 
>> appears resolved on JDK 27
>> 
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Shiv Shah has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add ExceptionDescribe before ExceptionClear in retransform003

One nit, otherwise looks good to me. Thanks

test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RetransformClasses/retransform003/retransform003.cpp
 line 130:

> 128: 
> 129:     if (!NSK_JNI_VERIFY_VOID(jni, 
> jni->CallStaticVoidMethod(callback_class, method_id, class_name_string, 
> agent_id)))
> 130:         return;

Suggestion:

    if (!NSK_JNI_VERIFY_VOID(jni, jni->CallStaticVoidMethod(callback_class, 
method_id, class_name_string, agent_id)))
        return;

Suggestion:

    NSK_JNI_VERIFY_VOID(jni, jni->CallStaticVoidMethod(callback_class, 
method_id, class_name_string, agent_id))

No need to check the return value as we return either way.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30711#pullrequestreview-4111385605
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30711#discussion_r3084503704

Reply via email to