On Thu, 7 May 2026 11:22:13 GMT, Matthias Baesken <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > do you have more infos on the issues with those tests mentioned by Chris ? > > > > > > I think Chris meant that only the test-cases where 'core' is in their name > > (which means they need to access the core dump file someway) should be > > excluded under UBSAN. > > Yes probably; should I remove the '!vm.ubsan' from those 3? You added them to > the JBS issue, so I thought I better exclude them too? It is my bad in giving only the Java filename of the tests that failed, and not the tests. I put it in more details to make sure that I have sent my message. There are more than one case in a single Java test file. Some of them need that the 'core' file exists and expect that it has some expressions. So, remove '!vm.ubsan' from the test-cases in a Java file that does not need the core file (i.e., there is no 'core' in the `@test id` line in the comments). Within the same Java file, there may be tests that need core files, then we should exclude the tests by '!vm.ubsan' . ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31035#issuecomment-4397158408
