On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 13:20:07 GMT, Johan Sjölen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know what's bug prone about the NMT usage, but maybe it is :-). Just to clarify my point. Having code named in a way that makes it sound like it does one thing and then have the implementation doing something differently is what I think is risky. The current usage isn't really risky, except maybe people misunderstanding the code. It's more about long-term maintainability and people accidentally reusing the code, thinking that it will do what the name says it will do. Given that this is confined to NMT and the NMT maintainers are happy with it, I'm fine with leaving this as-is. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31124#issuecomment-4613667782
