serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Withdrawn: 8340088: Stack tracing tests of sleeping thread should be more resilient to code changes duke
• RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8388530: JDI and JDWP spec cleanup to get rid of "if preview is enabled" Chris Plummer
• Withdrawn: 8209814: Convert java.lang.instrument shell tests to java duke
• RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Withdrawn: 8389759: ProblemList TestInstanceKlassSize.java and TestInstanceKlassSizeForInterface.java for --enable-preview Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v8] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388540: Need minor tweak in JVMTI intro section on value objects [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8385163: JMX: Use recommended MessageDigest comparison method Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8385163: JMX: Use recommended MessageDigest comparison method Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8385163: JMX: Use recommended MessageDigest comparison method Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8385163: JMX: Use recommended MessageDigest comparison method Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8385163: JMX: Use recommended MessageDigest comparison method Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read David CARLIER
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v2] David CARLIER
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v2] David CARLIER
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v2] David CARLIER
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v3] David CARLIER
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8389611: vframeStreamCommon::skip_prefixed_method_and_wrappers: unsigned underflow in prefix length leads to out-of-bounds read David CARLIER
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v16] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v4] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v4] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v5] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v6] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v6] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v6] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper [v6] Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8382272: Update nsk/jdb tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
• Withdrawn: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects David Simms
• Withdrawn: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects David Simms
• Withdrawn: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects David Simms
• Integrated: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: 8382276: Update nsk/jdwp to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382276: Update nsk/jdwp to use ThreadWrapper David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8382276: Update nsk/jdwp to use ThreadWrapper sendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8382276: Update nsk/jdwp to use ThreadWrapper Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8382276: Update nsk/jdwp to use ThreadWrapper duke
  • Integrated: 8382276: Update nsk/jdwp to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
• Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Fairoz Matte
  • Re: Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Fairoz Matte
  • Re: Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Kevin Walls
  • Re: Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Paul Hübner
  • Re: Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Fairoz Matte
  • Integrated: 8386884: GC.heap_dump -parallel accepts values outside uint range and silently wraps Fairoz Matte
• Withdrawn: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections duke
• RFR: 8389384: JDK-6960970 broke cross compilation on slow-debug level Guoxiong Li
  • Re: RFR: 8389384: JDK-6960970 broke cross compilation on slow-debug level David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8389384: JDK-6960970 broke cross compilation on slow-debug level Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389384: JDK-6960970 broke cross compilation on slow-debug level Guoxiong Li
  • Integrated: 8389384: JDK-6960970 broke cross compilation on slow-debug level Guoxiong Li
• RFR: 8253442: bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v3] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v6] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v7] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8253442: Bigapps SIGSEGV in DeadlockCycle::print_on_with Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v10] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v10] Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8385136: SA cannot unwind the native frame which does not have DWARF Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8325890: NMT: Arena Chunk value correction causes multiple errors in reporting Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 8327246: Add a jcmd diagnostic command to list Class origin URLs where possible [v5] Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) Roman Kennke
  • Withdrawn: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) duke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v2] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v3] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v3] Xin Liu
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v3] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v4] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v5] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v6] Roman Kennke
  • Re: RFR: 8383923: Implementation: Native Profiler Hook for Unbiased Stack Traces (Experimental) [v6] Xin Liu
• RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA Ekaterina Pavlova
  • Re: RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA Ekaterina Pavlova
  • Re: RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA duke
  • Re: RFR: 8388799: ClhsdbLongConstant should not assert a specific value for VM_Version::CPU_SHA Ekaterina Pavlova

• Earlier messages
• Later messages