I have experience with WebSphere 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0. I am now using
ServletExec as well. WebSphere has some nice features that some sites could
benefit from. However, you must get to version 2.0.2 in order to get the
minimal level of stability and performance that we all demand around here.
If you do not require the unique features that come with WebSphere and you
really only need a basic servlet engine then I would strongly recommend
ServletExec. It is very stable and fast and the tech support is superb.
-Eric
At 10:53 AM 4/8/99 -0400, Kito D. Mann wrote:
>Hey... I'm working with a client that's currently using IBM WebSphere
>Application Server 1.0 and is extremely unhappy with it. Has anyone had
>any experience with WebSphere 2.0 (their newsgroup isn't very well
>populated), and if not, has anyone worked with WebSphere _and_ either
>JRun or ServletExec. Any opinions? I'm thinking they need to move from
>WebSphere 1.0 to at least 2.0, but if 2.0 isn't more stable and less
>buggy, it's going to have to be something else. Any suggestions would be
>appreciated.
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
