Frank Carver wrote: > > I strongly agree. As I tried to point out in my comments, adding a new > "file type" > to a system is a bad thing. It means that work may have to be done on every > client system (millions) and many server systems to do some or all of the > following: > Client apps that care about this new file format are going to be very limited in number. Servers need to know what the file contains (the reason that a new extension is really a Good Thing), as do development tools that are used to create them and manipulate them. For any other "client", the file format used to deploy a web app is totally transparent. Craig McClanahan ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST". Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Publi... Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Publi... Jim Driscoll
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft donwash
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft guillaume ORIOL
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Chris Pratt
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Ted Neward
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Cezar Totth
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Ted Neward
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Frank Carver
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Chris Pratt
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft donwash
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Frank Carver
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Augusto Sellhorn
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft James Duncan Davidson
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draf... James Duncan Davidson
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review ... Jim Driscoll
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft James Duncan Davidson
- Re: Comments on 2.2 Public Review Draft Brian Zimbelman
