http://www.wakeassoc.com/setidriver/ is the home of SetiDriver. It caches wu's, integrates with SetiSpy, creates SetiLog.csv files. But the real reason I use it on my Windows platforms is because it gives me the ability to select the client priority. You determine how much of your processor power you want to allocate for doing wu's. To answer your question, yes it does affect processing times. You can still use SetiDriver with SetiQueue. Just set SetiDriver to only cache one (if you only have one processor). You will see the proxy/socks section when you get it up and running, just add your proxy to SetiQueue and your in business.
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >> Behalf Of Jeff Gerst >> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 7:25 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Linux WU Cache Program >> >> >> >> >> >> Dan Crooks wrote: >> >> > I have it all installed and running and appears to be just >> what I needed. >> > For those that have a windows machine on their network and >> want to cache >> > wu's for unix machines, this is the best solution I have found so far. >> > >> > An added bonus: you can still use SetiDriver to process wu's! >> > >> > Dan >> >> I have never used SetiDriver, what are the advantages? Will it >> some how decrease >> my average processing times? will it effect the results? I have >> been using >> SetiQueue for quite a while now and it works quite well for >> caching etc., but >> has no effect on the results, it simply works like a proxy server. >> >> == >> Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html >> This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. >> Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com == Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
