Bruce--
I've now been using SetiQueue for a week or so and I love it. The sky display is much more entertaining to look at, as well as being actually substantive. I've found that the 2 GHz Pentium machine in my office will polish off WUs in an average of just over 3:30, a good hour off the S@H screensaver time and faster than I'd expected. OTOH, SetiQueue on my home computer, a Pentium 700 MHz, runs WUs in about the _same_ length of time as the screensaver, 11:30. At my satellite office, a P4 866 runs WUs in about 8h vs. 10h. Don't know why the discrepancies, especially the lack of any improvement at all on my home computer. Any suggestions for optimizing the performance of SetiQueue? --howard Closing in on 2500.... == Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
