Is there still an advantage of using sticky sessions if your zeo server and
clients are all on the same machine? I had read this article and (maybe
incorrectly) thought that they weren't for me!

http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/sticky-sessions-and-mod_proxy_balancer



Steve McMahon wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> The global interpreter lock problem may no longer apply in Solaris
> 10.x. When it shows up, it basically makes threading slow. If you
> didn't build your own python, you might want to do so, and see if it
> improves the situation.
> 
> I think the general opinion for best utilization of multiple cores is
> to run lots of ZEO clients with few threads.  Use large object caches.
> If you've got lots of logged in users, make sure you're using sticky
> sessions with your load balancer. Make sure you're not swapping.
> 
>> on a restart
>> of Plone, it can take over 30 seconds before a page is displayed.
> 
> Is that the first page? If so, it's not unusual. If subsequent pages
> are that slow, something is seriously wrong.
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:47 AM, JimL <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> we seem to be experiencing speed issues on our quad core Sunfire T2000
>> box.
>> Doing a lot of reading I've come across lots of mention of Python
>> problems
>> with the Global Interpreter Lock, especially when coupled with the way
>> Solaris handles multi-threading : e.g.
>> http://www.zope.org/Members/glpb/solaris
>>
>> Despite setting up Zeo, with 4 clients (one per core), we are still
>> finding
>> Plone extremely slow.
>>
>> I've load balanced with Pound and then cached with Squid, and after
>> caching,
>> page speed isn't too bad (e.g. http://www.ibme.ox.ac.uk), but on a
>> restart
>> of Plone, it can take over 30 seconds before a page is displayed.
>>
>> Also connecting directly to port 8080 (for the first of our 4 clients)
>> Plone
>> seems to crawl.
>>
>> Hence I'm wondering if Linux is going to show an improvement.
>>
>> Cheers,  Jim
>>
>> Steve McMahon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I administer BSD, Linux and Solaris servers running Plone on
>>> forward-facing sites. With well-configured systems, the performance
>>> difference is negligible. Not anywhere enough to override the value of
>>> experience on a platform.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/What-sort-of-hardware-specs-are-people-running--tp2202890p2204292.html
>> Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Setup mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Steve McMahon
> Reid-McMahon, LLC
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Setup mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/What-sort-of-hardware-specs-are-people-running--tp2202890p2204572.html
Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Setup mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup

Reply via email to