I don't think we need a re-spin, since it's just a unit test change.

I'm not super sure it made sense to merge this, since we're about to
disable Oxygen jobs, but it also shouldn't be a big problem.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:12 PM Jamo Luhrsen <jluhr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> wait, we merged a new oxygen patch and are doing a re-spin? I thought we
> only did that for release blockers?
>
> that means we'll have to get everyone to sign off on the csit results
> again.
>
> JamO
>
> On 12/10/18 4:14 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
> > CSIT won't verify this, it is a change to UT code for an intermittent
> failure. If the build passes I think we are fine.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018, 4:38 AM Anil Belur <abe...@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:abe...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:11 PM Aswin Suryanarayanan <
> asury...@redhat.com <mailto:asury...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >         On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 9:00 PM Jamo Luhrsen <jluhr...@gmail.com
> <mailto:jluhr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >             On 12/8/18 3:19 AM, Ariel Adam wrote:
> >              > Hi everyone.
> >              > So our current situation is somewhat challenging with
> releasing Oxygen SR4 #509.
> >              >
> >              > On the one hand we have a number of pending and blocking
> jobs:
> >              >
> >              >   * *COE* (pending) - */Prem/*, please take a look
> >              >   * *Controller* (pending) - */Tom/*, please take a look
> >              >   * *Groupbasedpolicy* (pending) - */Michal/*, please
> take a look
> >              >   * *Netvirt* (blocking) - */Jamo/Sam/*, do we know why
> the failures happened?
> >              >   * *sfc* (blocking) - */Jamo/Brady/*, do we know what
> the failure happened?
> >
> >             Makes sure you check the notes column too. I try to keep
> that up to date with
> >             the jobs I'm investigating. At this point, I think I've been
> able to sign off
> >             on all that I was tracking. There was tons of infra and 3rd
> party software
> >             troubles recently that caused a lot of aborts and failures.
> We've been having
> >             to re-run and fix things as we found them.
> >
> >              >
> >              > On the other hand builds #511 and #512 failed each due to
> different reasons:
> >              >
> >              >   * Build #511 due to a possible environment issues
> (*Anil/Thanh* to comment)
> >
> >             yeah, looks like it to me too:
> >
> >             (https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/public/):
> GET request of:
> >
>  org/hibernate/hibernate-core/5.2.6.Final/hibernate-core-5.2.6.Final.jar
> from opendaylight-mirror failed:
> >             Premature end
> >             of Content-Length delimited message body (expected: 6550533;
> received: 192424 -> [Help 1]
> >
> >
> >              >   * Build #512 due to a problem in Netvirt (*Jamo/Sam* to
> comment)
> >
> >             sorry, not sure on this one. Adding Aswin
> >
> >         Adding Kiran,
> >
> >         As Kiran pointed out in different thread there is an issue in
> aclservice tests which should be fixed by [0]. But
> >         it is not yet merged.
> >
> >         [0] : https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/78412/
> >
> >
> >
> >     The change is merged, however I don't see this marked as a blocker
> on the tracking sheet.
> >     Do we need to re-trigger AR or can we just run the CSIT job to
> condirm the fix? Please advice.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Anil
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> release mailing list
> rele...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Reply via email to