Yeah, it's getting kind of old and does need updating. I will add it to
the queue.
-Norm
Steven M. Christensen wrote:
> Looks good to me Norm. Go for it.
>
> One note for the future. This version of ImageMagick is more than two
> years old I think. The most recent is 6.5.1-2. There are a great
> many additions and fixes since 6.3.4. Might be a good idea to update it
> at some point.
>
> Steve C.
>
> Norm Jacobs wrote:
>> It was recently brought to my attention that we were delivering
>> 64-bit ImageMagick commands in /usr/bin instead of the 32-bit
>> versions that should have been there. This is due to a problem with
>> the Makefile.sfw and the order that installation occurs. To fix it I
>> have done two things.
>>
>> 1. added a dependency so the 32-bit install always happens after the
>> 64-bit install
>> 2. modified bindir for the 64-bit build so that it installs it's
>> commands into a tmp space.
>>
>> These changes are very small (2 lines), and perhaps I don't really
>> need both, but they appear to resolve the issue.
>>
>> The bugster bug is
>> 6829259 /usr/bin/display: cannot execute binary file on AMD Athlon XP
>> It was originally reported at
>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8090
>>
>> I would appreciate it if anyone has an opportunity to review this
>> quickly as I am going to try and make it into build 113.
>>
>> Codereview is at
>>
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jacobs/sfw-6829259/
>>
>> -Norm
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>>
