I'll give that a try. I agree about the overloaded. And from what I'm seeing it is going to get worse with all the pressure for the groups to port the code.
Thanks much Alan Bruce Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Bruce Rothermal wrote: >> This is what I sent to Gary on 06/27 > > So your problem is not the ARC process, but that all the ARC > members are overloaded, especially with everyone trying to pile > in dozens of open source projects at once, and you picked one > that was especially busy. > > As a developer tool case, this sounds like one more appropriate > for LSARC, so perhaps an LSARC member/intern would be a better > choice? (LSARC also has a simplified checklist form to narrow > down how much review a open source import case needs.) >
