Paul Cunningham wrote:
> If this is the case then the 'package version' should be *removed* from 
> all packages in the sfwnv gate prior to FCS. If not, then it should be 
> in a *consistent* format across all pkgs.

Since the SVR4 packages should all be gone by FCS, I wouldn't put too
much effort into it for the nevada gate.

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
         Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


Reply via email to