Fair enough. For any whom are interested, further posts made concerning software delivery/architecture will be posted to ports-discuss until a more suitable place is found.
I will be posting a document this weekend for those working on this project to review and approve. It will detail the method of delivery as well as what options will be available. Dennis Clarke's software specification, if you will. Steve On 5/4/07, Brian Gupta <brian.gupta at gmail.com> wrote: > > Again, lets hold off on making these decisions until the draft > > document is ready. I have already accounted for these issues. > > > > What I am most concerned about at this point is the delivery of > > software rather than those that maintain it. Not that this isnt > > important, but it seems we are putting the cart before the horse so to > > speak. > > Huh? Software delivery is not really what we are talking about here. This is: > > http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=df6hcjb2_13hrtqsz > > Note that Software delivery is bullet 6 out of 9. We have other things > to work out. You should start a new thread with a different name to > discuss software packaging and delivery. (Vs. mixing it up with this > thread.) >
