On 10/05/07, Joseph Kowalski <jek3 at sun.com> wrote: > Eric Boutilier wrote: > > I think Danek's recent "focus-and-clear-lines" post (copied > > below) makes a _lot_ of sense. > Its cliche, but... +1 > > I'd already privately sent Danek mail simply saying "Thank you, thank > you, thank you". > > My preference would be to make these four separate projects (and I > completely agree > with Danek's decomposition), with some form of uber-project spanning > them to make > sure they stay aligned - just a thought.
That was my immediate thought as well. It's also one of the reasons why I think the various recent proposals have ended up in limbo. They lack focus. Splitting the much larger task of a reference distribution, etc. down into these four areas seems far more plausible and likely to be accomplished to me. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst binarycrusader at gmail.com - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
