Hi Dermot, On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 08:14 -0700, Dermot McCluskey wrote: > I've posted a webrev of the proposed changes for review: > http://cr.grommit.com/~dermot/ > > A few points to note/queries: > - I'm not doing a Source pkg. I think it was previously confirmed > that they are no longer necessary for open-source pkgs. Instead, I've > appended a link to the community site to the manpages (sunman.sed). > > - I'm keeping the manpages, infofiles and headers all in the main > package, rather that splitting out into SUNWsfman/inf/hea.
Info and man pages are okay in the base package, but development files need to go into a separate package so that they can be in the developer metacluster. There's no Sun-wide convention for naming development packages: JDS uses SUNWfoo-devel, X uses SUNWfoo-headers, openssl uses SUNWfoo-include. > - Want to confirm that I'm correctly setting the ownership for new > for /usr/gnu/share to root, bin. I think it should be root:sys to be consistent with /usr/share. > - Should /usr/share/info/dir be listed as editable or volatile instead > of standard file in the pkgmap? (I think Laca suggested this previously.) I did. I think it should be volatile. Laca
