* Dermot.McCluskey at Sun.COM <Dermot.McCluskey at Sun.COM> [2007-07-24 11:50]: > Why SUNW*gnu*-nano? Is there another non-GNU nano? I suppose I was worried about confusion with other uses of "nano", rather than another editor with that name.
> usr/src/cmd/nano/Makefile.sfw: > 80 $(ROOTSRC)/%: $(VER)/% > 81 $(INS.file) > This looks like an artifact from the source packages? I think the > ROOTSRC definition has even been removed from Makefile.master now. Will fix. > Minor nit: there are references to SUNWnano and > SFWgnu-which in the prototype_* file comments. Will fix. > Also, should we be including METADATA files in all new > SFW additions? Yep. Once we have it, I'd like to see, for instance, the introduction of sunman-stability.tmpl, based on the information in METADATA, so that manual pages get corrected automatically. - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
