* Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at sun.com> [2006-12-13 17:46]: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:37:35PM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > > GNU which and existing which have different output formats and > > different options handling. I suppose I am assuming that longevity > > makes current which(1) Committed for invocation and output; too > > strict? > > Not necessarily; I was just asking. You might want to make this explicit. > I haven't fully digested the /usr/gnu case yet, but you might suggest in > there that projects implementing it provide a brief analysis of why they > chose from the following possibilities: > > - replace Solaris command > - enhance Solaris command > - parallel Solaris command
Will attempt. > > > Why is the location Uncommitted? Shouldn't it be committed, modulo > > > PSARC/2006/000 (which, I assume, will be filed before this one is)? > > > > The location should be Committed. Will fix. > > Thanks. > > What about packaging? Is this going in SUNWcsu? There should be packaging > discussion in the usr/gnu case, too, but I'll take a closer look tomorrow. These would be new packages; tentative names would be SUNWcoreu and SUNWgwhich. (The former is a reprefixing of the SFWcoreu shipped on the Companion CD.) - Stephne -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems stephen.hahn at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
