Glynn Foster wrote: > Should we also start transitioning man pages into their own set of packages > rather than SUNWsfman?
And indeed this has been answered fully later in the thread - apologies for not reading before replying. Glynn
Glynn Foster wrote: > Should we also start transitioning man pages into their own set of packages > rather than SUNWsfman?
And indeed this has been answered fully later in the thread - apologies for not reading before replying. Glynn