Rainer Orth wrote: > George Vasick <George.Vasick at Sun.COM> writes: > > [...] > > I'd very much prefer that this be fixed in O/N instead of working around > the issue: from what I've read (I know almost nothing about x86/amd64 > assembly), this is invalid assembler code on amd64, and gas correctly > errors out here. Instead of cheating with continued use of gas 2.15, fix > the issue at the source.
I want to give you a quick update on the binutils status. I took a timeout to determine the extent of the source changes required in the onnv-gate to allow it to build with the 2.19 version of the assembler. I can build onnv successfully now and am working with the gatekeepers to see if I can have the changes incorporated. Thanks, George
