OK, unless someone else has a comment, I am fine with this issue now.

Steve C.


zheng he - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> See my comments in line.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Steven M. Christensen ??:
>> As with gdbm and lua recently, if clisp is in SFW, some programs will 
>> find it and try to use it and thus introduce a dependency on it.  Swig 
>> has the configure options
>>
>>   --without-clisp         Disable CLISP
>>   --with-clisp=path       Set location of CLISP executable (clisp)
>>
>> for example.   When you do your full SFW test build with clisp 
>> included, check to see what swig does with clisp.  If it uses it, 
>> someone will have to add the clisp package dependency into swig or fix 
>> swig so it does not use clisp.   
> 
> The configure script for swig package in sfwnv gate don't specify either 
> of above two options. And according to the output of "make -f 
> Makefile.sfw install", the building process did not use clisp. So I 
> think there is no dependence.
> 
>> There may be other packages that find clisp as well.
> I have searched the source tree of "usr/src" by "grep -i clisp * -r", 
> and did found any other package which contains "clisp" keyword. So it 
> seams safe to integrate clisp.
>>
>> Steve C.
> -Charles He
> 
> 

Reply via email to