Stefan Teleman wrote:
>
> Paul Cunningham wrote:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~steleman/6630180-6699388-6697908/
>> ==== Start of Comments ====
>>
>> 1. usr/src/lib/lcms/Makefile.sfw
>> Why has '--with-python' changed to '--without-python' for
>> the 64 bit stuff? Shouldn't 32 & 64 bit have the same
>> functionality (add comment to say why not maybe).
>
> There is no corresponding 64-bit vendor-packages directory for 64-bit Python
> (as
> per PSARC/2006/666), so 64-bit _lcms.so has no install directory.
I seem to see one in the sfw gate:
{mike_s:yavin:1001} pwd
/ws/sfwnv-gate/proto/root_sparc/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/64
{mike_s:yavin:1002} ls
cups.so* libxml2mod.so*
{mike_s:yavin:1003} file *.so
cups.so: ELF 64-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARCV9 Version 1,
dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available
libxml2mod.so: ELF 64-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARCV9 Version 1,
dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available
(unless I misread). It may have come in with
6598832 need 64-bit Python libxml bindings
(though it's hard to tell with all the merge deltas in Targetdirs,
whoops). Though it's probably not quite right as it's a directory,
and usually what we do is have the 64-bit arch there with 64 as a
link to it, like 64->amd64, though I don't remember why we did that.
But it looks like everything else does.
Mike
