Spoorthy H.S wrote:
>> [Not a full review, just some questions and an observation.]
>>
>> Shouldn't new perl modules be building for 5.10 instead of 5.8.4 now?
>>
>>
> I will port the package for both the perl versions. This is for perl 5.8.4.
Why is it needed for 5.8.4 at all?
>> Why do you deliver the _des.c & .h source files into /usr/demo?
>>
>>
> If not, where should these be delivered ? I have the same in ARC
> proposal also.
Why should they be delivered? Sources for the delivered binaries
aren't usually part of the package.
>> It would be really nice if this module could use one of the many existing
>> DES implementations on Solaris instead of shipping yet another, but
>> changing
>> that would pretty much replace all the upstream source code, so I
>> guess is
>> outside the realm of a simple port.
>>
> How can I use the existing DES implementations ?
Hopefully someone on security-interest at sun.com can help there.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
