On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 23:11, Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) via Lib <[email protected]> wrote: > > This was explicitly brought up for review in LWG and if I recall correctly > the result was that we were OK with this inconsistency since that feature > test macro had already been shipping in implementation(s).
Vague recollections are not worth much to me. This is at http://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/LWGThursdayAfternoon "Discussion about inconsistency of __cpp_lib_array_constexpr vs __cpp_lib_constexpr_*header* Consistency is nice, but not necessary. No consensus to change. " Granted, those notes aren't worth much to me either. :) They do seem to indicate that LWG discussed this very matter. I still don't see a very convincing reason to deviate from the policy, considering Richard's correct remark that the existing feature-testing macro can continue to ship. -- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
