On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 00:59, Casey Carter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Shipping multiple feature-test macros for the same feature is trivially > simple for implementors. Requiring users to check multiple feature-test > macros to detect a single feature - the detection needs to work both in old > and new implementations - seems hostile.
Fully agreed, but I don't see anyone suggesting such hostilities. You can continue shipping the old spellings, and we all can, and we can still do the policy-fixes in the standard, and no user will be hurt the slightest. That's what I mean by not seeing a convincing argument to deviate from the policy; renaming __cpp_lib_array_constexpr doesn't in any way prevent you from continuing to ship that macro spelling. -- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
